Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 December 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Evaluated

SCV for 2010-12-06 Edit

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
[edit]
I originally blanked one section which has now been edited out by the creator, but I've since found further copied material; the Aged Care section is from p16 of the same document, the Volunteering section from p22 and Geelong Hospital Appeal from http://www.barwonhealth.org.au/geelonghospitalappeal/abouttheappeal/default.aspx. I've now blanked the whole thing as it all reads like it's been copied from other promotional material. January (talk) 12:34, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. I'm tagging this "n" because I believe this is backwards infringement for reasons explained at the article's talk page. There's no doubt there's bigtime COI going on here, and the resistance to verifying notability is concerning, but there is evidence of natural evolution of this content here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dubious: copyvio template added by IP user with one other, vandalism, edit. No source of copyvio suggested. Article is mainly a list, and seems to have grown organically since 2003, though something of a vandalism magnet (school syllabus?). I don't see a problem. PamD (talk) 11:50, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]